ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2025
Comprehensive assessment of 5 interleukin inhibitors for the treatment of psoriasis: scientific guidance based on drug selection recommendations for Chinese medical institutions.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Based on the best available evidence, rapid health technology was used to assess 5 interleukin inhibitors approved for marketing in China. This assessment aims to promote the rational use of drugs in the clinic and provide a reference basis for the selection of drugs by medical institutions in China. Methods: Depending on the Rapid Guidelines for Drug Evaluation and Selection in Chinese Medical Institutions (the Second Edition), we evaluated the pharmacological properties, efficacy, safety, economy, and other attributes of interleukin inhibitors by assigning scores. Results: The rankings of composite scores, from highest to lowest, were as follows: ixekizumab with 68.8 points, secukinumab with 65.47 points, ustekinumab with 65.41 points, tildrakizumab with 62.6 points, and guselkumab with 61.64 points, taking into account the results from the 5 dimensions. Conclusion: Until the guideline recommendations, the National Essential Drug List, clinical studies, and many other dimensions of this assessment are updated, ixekizumab, secukinumab, and ustekinumab, which have the top 3 scores, can be used as a priority recommendation for Chinese medical institutions to select interleukin inhibitors and optimise the use of the drug catalog based on the scoring results of this assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.