Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210571›Full record

ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2025

Optimization of acid suppression utilizing esophageal ambulatory pH monitoring: a single center retrospective review.

Scarlett Austin, Helene Bloom, Yue Yin, Akash Gadani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Scarlett AustinAllegheny Center for Digestive Health, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0464-4252
Helene BloomAllegheny Center for Digestive Health, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7801-6076
Yue YinAllegheny Center for Digestive Health, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8294-5216
Akash GadaniAllegheny Center for Digestive Health, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2865-3090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ambulatory esophageal reflux monitoring allows for objective differentiation of pathologic reflux, reflux hypersensitivity, and functional heartburn. Defining a diagnosis as the etiology of symptoms allows for appropriate medication management, and specifically de-escalation of acid suppression medications such as proton-pump inhibitors. Methods: This retrospective chart review examined patients who underwent ambulatory esophageal reflux monitoring within a single health network between September 2021 and January 2024 to determine if appropriate postprocedure medication management occurred. Demographic data, acid suppressive therapy prior to monitoring, results of monitoring, and changes to therapy were reviewed and statistical analysis was performed. Results: In the study group, 85 patients were diagnosed with pathologic reflux based on a DeMeester score of ≥14.72; Caucasians and those with a higher body mass index were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with pathologic reflux. Acid suppression was de-escalated in 11 of the 29 patients diagnosed with functional heartburn and 4 of the 33 with reflux hypersensitivity. Conclusion: Opportunities remain to improve therapy de-escalation and adjustment in the nonpathologic reflux conditions of reflux hypersensitivity and functional heartburn.

Indexed as

Ambulatory pH monitoringfunctional heartburngastroesophageal reflux diseasepathologic refluxreflux hypersensitivity

Identifiers

PMID41210571
PMCPMC12591583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.