Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210535›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025

Timing of Vasopressin Initiation in Patients with Septic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.

Anirban Bhattacharjee, Priyankar K Datta, Vivek Kumar, Rajathadri H Ravikumar, Prachee Sathe, Riddhi Kundu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Timing Matters: Caution and Opportunity in Early Vasopressin for Septic Shock.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Author Response: Timing Matters: Caution and Opportunity in Early Vasopressin for Septic Shock.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Early Vasopressin in Septic Shock-Promise, Paradox, and the Pursuit of Precision.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anirban BhattacharjeeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7657-7450
Priyankar K DattaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine & Critical Care, AIIMS New Delhi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7868-2545
Vivek KumarDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Symbiosis Medical College for Women & Symbiosis University Hospital and Research Centre, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6914-5422
Rajathadri H RavikumarDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9295-5933
Prachee SatheDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1236-1669
Riddhi KunduDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6222-1974

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to study the timing of vasopressin initiation and its association with patient-centered outcomes in adult patients with septic shock. Data sources and study selection: We searched Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science for eligible prospective, retrospective studies, and Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from January 2013 to December 2024 in adult patients with septic shock that compared an early (<6 hours) vs late strategy (>6 hours) of vasopressin initiation. Our primary outcome was short-term mortality, while other secondary outcomes included hospital and ICU mortality, incidence of renal replacement therapy (RRT), occurrence of new-onset arrhythmias (NOA), and ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results: Seven studies with a total of 3,993 patients were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Early initiation of vasopressin was associated with a lower short-term mortality [relative risk (RR) 0.84, 95% CI: 0.71-0.99; Conclusion: We report a significant advantage of initiating vasopressin within six hours for patients experiencing septic shock. However, the studies contributing to this meta-analysis are characterized as being at high risk of bias. How to cite this article: Bhattacharjee A, Datta PK, Kumar V, Ravikumar RH, Sathe P, Kundu R. Timing of Vasopressin Initiation in Patients with Septic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(10):839-850.

Indexed as

Meta-analysisMortalitySeptic shockTimingVasopressin

Identifiers

PMID41210535
PMCPMC12592957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.