Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210473›Full record

ArticleAME case reports2025

Transient unilateral oculomotor and trigeminal nerve palsy following intranasal local anesthetic infiltration: a case report.

Samuel Tholl, Juan Carlos Hernaiz Leonardo, Richmond Quan Qing Lim, Azin Tabari, Amin Javer

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel ThollFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2989-9377
Juan Carlos Hernaiz LeonardoDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3013-2683
Richmond Quan Qing LimDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6204-5210
Azin TabariDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0097-7148
Amin JaverDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3116-6559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Complications from in-office inferior turbinate (IT) and septal swell body coblation typically include pain, congestion, and bleeding. However, rare cases of cranial nerve palsies from local anesthetic infiltration can occur. We present a rare case of an oculomotor nerve palsy and palsies of the ophthalmic (V1) and maxillary (V2) branches of the trigeminal nerve following intranasal local anesthetic infiltration prior to coblation, a complication not previously documented in the literature. Awareness of such rare and transient complications can help surgeons and clinicians avoid unnecessary interventions and better counsel patients. Case Description: A 75-year-old female with a one-year history of recalcitrant bilateral nasal obstruction underwent an in-office primary bilateral coblation of the ITs and septal swell bodies. Four percent lidocaine-soaked neuropatties were applied over the ITs and septal swell bodies, followed by infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride with 1:200,000 epinephrine. Shortly after infiltration, the patient developed left-sided ptosis and was unable to adduct the left eye, causing diplopia. Additionally, the patient reported paresthesia in the V1 and V2 dermatomes. All symptoms resolved within 15 minutes. At the 6-week post-procedure visit, there was no sustained diplopia, left eye ptosis, or facial paresthesia. These symptoms also remained absent at the six-month post-procedure visit. Conclusions: Although relatively low-risk, surgeons should be aware of potential cranial nerve complications associated with intranasal anesthetic administration. Recognizing the benign and reversible nature of such presentations may help avoid unnecessary diagnostic workups, reduce patient distress, and reinforce best practices such as aspiration prior to infiltration and slow injection techniques.

Indexed as

Case reportin-office proceduresintranasal anestheticoculomotor nerve palsytrigeminal nerve palsy

Identifiers

PMID41210473
PMCPMC12593149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.