ArticleAME case reports2025
Rectus sternalis-a rare anatomical variation found during mastectomy: report of two cases and literature review.
Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rectus sternalis (RS) is a rare normal variant of the anterior chest wall musculature; in humans, it is occasionally found while it is part of some animals' musculature. It was first reported in 1604, but it did not catch much attention and was only formally described in 1726. Many names have been used to refer to it, such as RS or musculus sternalis. It is mostly observed in Asians, and in Saudi Arabia, the prevalence was found to be 4%. It can be confused with tumors of the anterior chest wall during routine mammography. Also, it can affect the radiation field after surgery and can be utilized in reconstructive surgery. So, we believe that it is important for oncology surgeons, radiologists, radiation oncologists and reconstructive surgeons to have the knowledge of this rare anatomical variation. Case Description: We report two cases of RS muscle discovered in Saudi Arabian females during modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer, paying special attention to its correct identification, its clinical importance, and its impact on treatment of breast cancer. The first case is a 47-year-old female with bilateral RS who underwent mastectomy for inflammatory breast cancer, while the second is a 50-year-old female with a unilateral muscle who underwent mastectomy for invasive ductal carcinoma. Conclusions: Surgeons should be knowledgeable of such variation as the muscle can be a differential diagnosis, may affect the management of breast cancer, and can be used in reconstructive surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.