ArticleAME case reports2025
A case series of adenomyoepithelioma of the breast with a case of malignant adenomyoepithelioma misinterpreted as polymorphous adenocarcinoma.
Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) of the breast is a rare tumor composed of epithelial and myoepithelial cells, typically exhibiting benign behavior. However, malignant transformation (MAME), local recurrence, and distant metastases have been reported. Polymorphous adenocarcinoma (PmA), an exceptionally rare breast carcinoma, can mimic MAME morphologically, complicating diagnosis and management. Due to their rarity, standardized management guidelines remain undefined highlighting the need for further research and comprehensive evaluation. Case Description: This study presents nine cases of AME diagnosed at a single institution diagnosed with AME, including one initially misdiagnosed with PmA but later reclassified as MAME. The patients aged 31-61 years with a varied clinical presentation including palpable masses (n=3), lesions detected on mammography (n=4), microcalcifications (n=1), and nipple discharge (n=1). Imaging findings revealed predominantly solid masses with lobulated contours on ultrasound (US) and variable enhancement patterns on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis, including p63, CK5/6, and calponin, was essential for confirming diagnoses. The highlight case involved a 54-year-old woman initially diagnosed with PmA based on histopathological evaluation. However, upon retrospective review, the lesion was reclassified as MAME due to predominant myoepithelial differentiation. The patient received surgical excision and radiation therapy and remained disease-free after 78 months of follow-up. AME typically presents as a unilateral, centrally located mass, with recurrence rates of 11.1% reported. MAME, characterized by high mitotic rates and cellular atypia, requires aggressive management, while PmA, a low-grade carcinoma, often exhibits perineural invasion and triple-negative status. Conclusions: This case series underscores the diagnostic challenges and importance of accurate differentiation between AME, MAME, and PmA, as misdiagnosis can significantly impact treatment and prognosis and highlighting the importance of IHC and molecular profiling. Given the potential for recurrence and metastasis, complete excision with negative margins remains the mainstay of treatment. This series contributes to the limited literature on these rare tumors, emphasizing the critical role of meticulous pathological evaluation and multidisciplinary approaches to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.