ArticleAME case reports2025
Unusual case of topiramate-induced auditory-visual synaesthesia in a non-synaesthete young adult: a case report.
Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Synaesthesia is a perceptual phenomenon where stimulation of one sensory modality leads to automatic experiences in another. While often congenital, acquired forms-particularly pharmacologically induced synaesthesia-are rare and poorly understood. Topiramate, an antiepileptic and migraine prophylactic agent, affects neuronal excitability and sensory integration, but its association with synaesthesia has rarely been documented. Case Description: We report the case of a 28-year-old male software engineer with no prior neurological or psychiatric history who developed auditory-visual synaesthesia two weeks after initiating topiramate for migraine prophylaxis. The patient consistently visualised specific colours in response to particular environmental sounds such as phone rings and rainfall. Clinical examination, neurological evaluation, and comprehensive diagnostic workup-including brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), audiological, and ophthalmological assessments-were normal, excluding structural lesions and primary sensory abnormalities. The symptoms, although non-distressing, significantly intrigued the patient, prompting medical consultation. Symptoms resolved gradually over eight weeks following discontinuation of topiramate, supporting a diagnosis of drug-induced synaesthesia. The patient was subsequently started on propranolol for migraine management, which was well-tolerated, effectively controlled migraines, and did not trigger any recurrence of synaesthetic experiences. Conclusions: This case highlights a rare but clinically relevant side effect of topiramate and underscores the importance of thorough medication history in evaluating atypical sensory experiences. Primary care clinicians should consider pharmacological causes in sudden-onset synaesthesia, ensuring prompt identification, appropriate referral, and alternative treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.