ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Objective Measurement of Skin Color Matching in Flap Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Flap reconstruction outcomes can be compromised by color mismatch between transferred tissue and the recipient site, potentially causing patient distress. This systematic review comprehensively evaluated color matching in flaps across various anatomical regions and donor sites. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase was conducted from their inception to May 24, 2024 to identify studies addressing color matching in flaps. A narrative analysis was performed to synthesize the findings, focusing on 3 main categories: head and neck, breast, and extremities. The studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tool. Results: Out of 649 screened articles, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 7 on the head and neck, 3 on the breast, and 1 on the extremities. All studies were assessed to have a low to moderate risk of bias. The Conclusions: The studies emphasize a focus on head and neck reconstructions in color match research, highlighting significant gaps in other anatomical areas. Future research should prioritize patient involvement and the integration of large-scale national databases to better address aesthetic and psychological outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.