ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Evaluating shock index for prediction of adverse maternal outcomes related to postpartum haemorrhage and maternal sepsis in Sierra Leone: a prospective observational cohort study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and sepsis account for more than half of global maternal deaths. Shock index (SI), the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure, has shown superior prediction of adverse outcomes compared to other vital signs, but most studies are retrospective, with limited evidence in sepsis. We aimed to prospectively evaluate SI for adverse outcome prediction in PPH and sepsis. Methods: This prospective cohort study was undertaken between March 2022 and July 2023 in three hospitals in Sierra Leone, in 495 and 855 women with PPH or sepsis respectively. 'First' and 'worst' SI measured in each woman was compared to other vital signs, including modified shock index (MSI), for prediction of outcomes (maternal death; major procedure; lowest haemoglobin <70 g/L; blood transfusion ≥4 international units). Predictive statistics confirmed previously determined SI thresholds (<0.9; 0.9-1.69; ≥1.7), and evaluated SI for rule-out and rule-in of adverse outcomes. Findings: SI most consistently predicted adverse outcomes compared to other vital signs, including the MSI. In cases of PPH and sepsis, the risk of adverse outcomes increased with higher SI thresholds. For maternal death in PPH, the odds ratios were 5.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.82-19.53) and 10.02 (95% CI: 3.94-25.50) for the first and worst recorded SI values respectively, and in sepsis, odds ratios were 1.91 (95% CI 0.24-15.26) and 15.4 (95% CI 7.6-31.1) for first and worst recorded SI values, when comparing SI ≥ 1.7 to SI 0.9-1.69. Sensitivity ranged from 88.4% to 95.2%, and negative predictive value ranged from 73.8% to 98.9% across outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated poorer SI prediction of maternal death in the presence of hypertension (0.86 vs 0.59, p = 0.0020). Interpretation: SI could effectively rule-in and rule-out adverse outcomes in PPH and sepsis, enabling targeted management, and appropriate resource allocation by health care workers, and informing updates to national definitions and guidelines by policy makers. Future work should further explore the impact of hypertension on SI performance. Funding: This study was funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MR/T038942/1) and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR133232).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.