Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210386›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Evaluating shock index for prediction of adverse maternal outcomes related to postpartum haemorrhage and maternal sepsis in Sierra Leone: a prospective observational cohort study.

Katy Kuhrt, Foday Janneh, Rossetta Cole, Alexandra Ridout, Cristina Fernandez-Turienzo, Paul T Seed, Kate Bramham, Andrew H Shennan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katy KuhrtDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Foday JannehPrincess Christian Maternity Hospital, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Fourah Bay Road, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Rossetta ColePrincess Christian Maternity Hospital, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Fourah Bay Road, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Alexandra RidoutDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Cristina Fernandez-TurienzoDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Paul T SeedDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Kate BramhamDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Andrew H ShennanDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and sepsis account for more than half of global maternal deaths. Shock index (SI), the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure, has shown superior prediction of adverse outcomes compared to other vital signs, but most studies are retrospective, with limited evidence in sepsis. We aimed to prospectively evaluate SI for adverse outcome prediction in PPH and sepsis. Methods: This prospective cohort study was undertaken between March 2022 and July 2023 in three hospitals in Sierra Leone, in 495 and 855 women with PPH or sepsis respectively. 'First' and 'worst' SI measured in each woman was compared to other vital signs, including modified shock index (MSI), for prediction of outcomes (maternal death; major procedure; lowest haemoglobin <70 g/L; blood transfusion ≥4 international units). Predictive statistics confirmed previously determined SI thresholds (<0.9; 0.9-1.69; ≥1.7), and evaluated SI for rule-out and rule-in of adverse outcomes. Findings: SI most consistently predicted adverse outcomes compared to other vital signs, including the MSI. In cases of PPH and sepsis, the risk of adverse outcomes increased with higher SI thresholds. For maternal death in PPH, the odds ratios were 5.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.82-19.53) and 10.02 (95% CI: 3.94-25.50) for the first and worst recorded SI values respectively, and in sepsis, odds ratios were 1.91 (95% CI 0.24-15.26) and 15.4 (95% CI 7.6-31.1) for first and worst recorded SI values, when comparing SI ≥ 1.7 to SI 0.9-1.69. Sensitivity ranged from 88.4% to 95.2%, and negative predictive value ranged from 73.8% to 98.9% across outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated poorer SI prediction of maternal death in the presence of hypertension (0.86 vs 0.59, p = 0.0020). Interpretation: SI could effectively rule-in and rule-out adverse outcomes in PPH and sepsis, enabling targeted management, and appropriate resource allocation by health care workers, and informing updates to national definitions and guidelines by policy makers. Future work should further explore the impact of hypertension on SI performance. Funding: This study was funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MR/T038942/1) and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR133232).

Indexed as

Maternal sepsisPostpartum haemorrhageShock indexVital signs

Identifiers

PMID41210386
PMCPMC12590223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.