Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210382›Full record

ReviewEClinicalMedicine2025

Mental health stigma and its consequences: a systematic scoping review of pathways to discrimination and adverse outcomes.

Anna Kågström, Zoe Guerrero, Akmal Alikhan Aliev, Hana Tomášková, Nicolas Rüsch, Uta Ouali, Graham Thornicroft, Norman Sartorius, Petr Winkler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna KågströmDepartment of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
Zoe GuerreroDepartment of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
Akmal Alikhan AlievDepartment of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
Hana TomáškováDepartment of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
Nicolas RüschDepartment of Psychiatry II, Ulm University and BKH Günzburg, Lindenallee 2, 89312, Günzburg, Germany.
Uta OualiDepartment Psychiatry A, Razi Hospital La Manouba, Rue Des Oranges, 2010, Manouba, Tunisia.
Graham ThornicroftInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Norman SartoriusAssociation for the Improvement of Mental Health Programmes, 20, Chemin Colladon, CH-1209, Geneva, Switzerland.
Petr WinklerWHO Collaborating Center for Public Mental Health Research and Service Development, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current research evaluating the consequences of stigma towards people with mental illness is not nuanced in emphasizing the critical distinction between stigma as negative attitudes and discrimination as harmful behaviours that limit access to services, employment, and social inclusion. Understanding these distinctions is essential for designing targeted, evidence-based universal, targeted and indicated interventions to improve the quality of life and well-being. This review evaluates the evidence on the consequences of stigma towards people with mental illness. Using PRISMA guidelines, we analysed 448 studies (294 quantitative, 154 qualitative) investigating stigma's negative outcomes. Findings were categorized into health, service use, psychosocial, economic, and structural impacts. Although stigma is consistently associated with adverse outcomes across life domains, evidence of a causal link between negative attitudes and poorer outcomes for individuals with mental disorders remains limited. Furthermore, there is a striking scarcity of research from low- and middle-income countries, with significant regional gaps, and studies addressing structural stigma embedded in societal institutions are particularly rare. Efforts to combat stigma must distinguish between attitudes and behaviours, focusing on reducing discrimination while enhancing public mental health literacy and access to effective interventions. Tackling these challenges requires a comprehensive, evidence-informed approach to improving mental health outcomes for all.

Indexed as

AttitudesDiscriminationGlobal mental healthMental healthMental illnessStigma

Identifiers

PMID41210382
PMCPMC12593596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.