ArticleGenetics in medicine open2025
Enhanced detection and characterization of germline structural variants in cancer predisposition genes via genome sequencing.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes are found in approximately 10% of all cancer cases. Although multigene panel testing is the current first-tier approach for detecting variants in these genes, it has limitations in identifying and characterizing copy-number variants and other structural variants (SVs). Genome sequencing (GS) provides a more uniform coverage throughout the genome, thereby offering a more comprehensive method for copy-number variant and SV detection; however, its diagnostic utility in genetic testing for cancer predisposition remains underexplored. Methods: In this study, we performed GS on 33 patients with previously identified germline SVs in cancer predisposition genes, including 25 deletions, 7 duplications, and 1 mobile element insertion. Results: Using 2 SV callers in the DRAGEN pipeline, GS achieved 100% sensitivity in detecting these SVs. Moreover, GS revealed additional insights not available through previous clinical testing in 9 (27%) cases, including identifying a complex SV, clarifying structural configuration of intragenic duplications, and refining breakpoints at base-pair resolution. Conclusion: Taken together, our findings support the utility of GS as the sequencing backbone for germline genetic testing of cancer predisposition genes with improved detection, characterization, and clinical interpretation of SVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.