Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210359›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Hom N Gartaula, Gebrelibanos Gebremariam, Moti Jaleta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hom N GartaulaInternational Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Pili Drive, Los Banõs, 4031, Philippines.
Gebrelibanos GebremariamMekelle University, 231, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Moti JaletaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), ILRI Sholla Campus, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This dataset provides household- and plot-level information on wheat farmers in Ethiopia, with a focus on gender dynamics, rainfall variability, and farmers' preferences for wheat varietal traits. The survey was implemented in 2021 by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) under the Accelerating Genetic Gains in Wheat (AGG) project and covered 1,088 households across the country's major wheat-growing regions. The questionnaire included modules on household demographics, farm and plot characteristics, wheat production practices, varietal adoption and seed sourcing, gendered decision-making, access to extension services, social capital and networking, food security, dietary diversity, and health. It also documents farmers' preferences for key varietal traits, including yield potential, drought tolerance, disease resistance, straw yield, baking quality, and nutritional attributes. Household GPS coordinates were used to link survey responses with high-resolution rainfall data, enabling analysis of climate variability and its interaction with household and farm-level outcomes. This dataset provides a valuable resource for researchers and policymakers to examine how gender roles and agroecological conditions shape demand for wheat traits, with implications for designing climate-resilient and gender-responsive seed system interventions in Ethiopia.

Indexed as

Climate variabilityEthiopiaGenderSeed systemsVarietal preferencesWheat

Identifiers

PMID41210359
PMCPMC12594928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.