ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Demoralization and dignity loss in breast cancer: A network analysis and computer simulation study.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time Toxicity in Advanced Breast Cancer: Psychological Burden, Psychiatric Vulnerability, and Implications for Patient-Centered Decision-Making.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Social support, resilience, and demoralization in patients with breast cancer: a moderated network analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Demoralization syndrome among women exposed to war: comparing breast cancer survivors and those with no breast cancer history.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Demoralization and loss of dignity frequently co-occur among individuals with cancer. However, their symptom-level associations remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to delineate the underlying pathways linking demoralization and dignity loss in breast cancer survivors and to identify potential symptom targets for intervention. Methods: A total of 411 female breast cancer survivors were assessed using the Demoralization Scale II and the Patient Dignity Inventory. A Gaussian graphical model was used to identify central and bridge symptoms, while a Bayesian network model estimated the directional associations and potential causal pathways between demoralization and dignity-related symptoms. Computer-simulated intervention analyses were conducted to determine which symptom reduction would yield the greatest decrease in overall network activation. Results: In the Gaussian network, illness uncertainty emerged as the most central symptom (strength = 1.20), and loss of life meaning as the principal bridge symptom (bridge strength = 0.30). The Bayesian network identified distress as an upstream node triggering downstream cascades from demoralization to dignity loss. Simulation analyses indicated that reducing distress led to the largest decrease in global network activation (from 5.3% to 1.9%). Conclusions: This study elucidates the symptom-level mechanisms through which demoralization contributes to dignity loss in breast cancer survivors, highlighting loss of life meaning as a key bridging factor. Targeting distress may represent an effective intervention strategy to concurrently alleviate demoralization and preserve dignity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.