ReviewChemical science2025
Machine learning spectroscopy to advance computation and analysis.
Review in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliable characterization of polymer electrolytes for next-generation energy storage: misinterpretations, challenges, and methodological solutions.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Transient X‑ray Absorption Signatures of Photodissociation Pathways and Conical Intersection Dynamics in Phenol.JACS Au · 2026Article
- Multiscale Machine Learning Prediction of Infrared Spectra of Solvated Molecules.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spectroscopy, the exploration of matter through its interaction with electromagnetic radiation, is relevant in many diverse research fields, such as biology, materials science, medicine, and chemistry, and enables the qualitative and quantitative characterization of samples. Machine learning has revolutionized spectroscopy by enabling computationally efficient predictions of electronic properties, expanding libraries of synthetic data, and facilitating high-throughput screening. While machine learning has strengthened theoretical computational spectroscopy, its potential in processing experimental data has yet to be adequately explored. At the same time, automating structure and composition predictions from spectra remains a formidable challenge that requires theoretical simulations and expert knowledge. This review addresses the synergy between machine learning and spectroscopy, covering various techniques including optical, X-ray, nuclear magnetic resonance, and mass spectrometry. It outlines the fundamentals of machine learning, summarizes the techniques, and previews future developments to fully exploit the potential of machine learning and advance the field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.