ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Targeting visual-sensory and cognitive impairments following lateral ankle sprains: a practical framework for functional assessment across the return-to-sport continuum-Part 1. Sensory reweighting and cognitive impairments: what are we really talking about and why clinicians should consider central alterations in return to sport criteria.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Neuromuscular characteristics of individuals with chronic ankle instability during unilateral landing tasks: a meta-analysis of electromyographic studies.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- Measurement Technologies for Ankle-Dorsiflexion Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Sensing Approaches and Their Relationships with Gait Performance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Distinct Movement-Related Cortical Control Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Scoping Review.Sports medicine - open · 2026Review
- Targeting visual-sensory and cognitive impairments following lateral ankle sprains: a practical framework for functional assessment across the return-to-sport continuum. Part 2: from theory to practice: recommendations for optimizing return to sport after lateral ankle sprains using cognitive and visual-sensory assessments.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is the most common traumatic injury, with a high recurrence rate and chronic ankle instability (CAI) developing in ∼40% of cases. LAS leads to patho-mechanical, sensory-perceptual and motor-behavioral deficits. Poor management of the return-to-sport (RTS) is now considered a major cause of re-injury and development of CAI, particularly due to the lack of validated tests and the failure of existing ones to account for those central deficits. The first part of this topic aimed to clarify concepts of cognitive constructs and sensory reweighting and their association with CAI. We also aimed to identify objective RTS criteria and discuss their limits regarding their ability to encompass central impairments. Motor-cognitive deficits have been identified using computerized cognitive tasks and dual-task paradigms. More specifically, deficits in visual memory, processing speed or inhibitory control and attentional resource allocation have demonstrated reduced performance in CAI populations. In addition, altered sensory reweighting process towards visual input has also been observed. While objective criteria are crucial to prevent re-injury, current evaluations remain largely subjective and central impairments are unaccounted for in conventional RTS testing. The Ankle-GO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.