ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Improving diagnostic interpretability of abdominal ultrasound for neonates with suspected intestinal injury.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Abdominal ultrasound (AUS) is increasingly utilized as a diagnostic adjunct in neonates undergoing evaluation for intestinal injuries such as necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), volvulus, and intestinal obstruction, which need urgent surgical evaluation and often emergent intervention. However, the interpretability of AUS-defined as the number of explicit documentations of high-risk ultrasound findings (HRF)-varies in radiology reports, potentially influenced by clinical and technical factors. Objective: To identify clinical and technical factors associated with increased interpretability of neonatal AUS in the evaluation of suspected intestinal injury needing surgical intervention. Methods: This retrospective, single-center case series reviewed AUS exams performed from 2022 to 2024 at a level IV neonatal intensive care unit. All neonates who had AUS performed prior to exploratory laparotomy were included in the study. For this project "interpretability of AUS" was defined as the number of explicit reporting of eight predefined HRF indicative of surgical need: pneumoperitoneum, increased or decreased bowel wall thickness, reduced intestinal perfusion on color Doppler, absent or decreased peristalsis, bowel dilation, complex intra-abdominal fluid collections, and reversed orientation of the superior mesenteric artery and vein. Clinical and technical factors that may have potentially influenced interpretability were analyzed. Results: Twenty-eight AUS exams from 18 neonates were analyzed. The median gestational age at birth was 34 Conclusions: In our pilot study, interpretability of neonatal AUS images was strongly influenced by using higher-frequency transducers (>10 MHz) with better resolution, particularly in neonates weighing <2 kg. Obtaining serial imaging improved subsequent interpretability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.