SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Efficacy and safety of nebulized inhalation vs. intramuscular delivery of interferon α1b injection for paediatric patients with viral respiratory diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and evaluation of an inhalable nanoemulsion system for enhancing NK cell function against osteosarcoma pulmonary metastases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of nebulized inhalation vs. intramuscular delivery of interferon α1b (IFN α1b) for paediatric patients with viral respiratory diseases. Methods: A comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and China Biology Medicine disc (Sinomed) was conducted to identify relevant literature on the use of interferon α1b in children. The search timeframe spanned from database inception to April 2025. Results: A total of 16 studies involving 2002 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that the overall efficacy rate in the nebulized inhalation group (94.85%) was significantly greater than that in the intramuscular injection group (82.39%) ( Conclusion: Compared with intramuscular injection, nebulized inhalation significantly increased the efficacy and safety of IFN α1b in treating paediatric patients with viral respiratory diseases. For children with both herpangina and bronchiolitis, nebulized inhalation was more effective; however, no significant difference was found in the incidence of adverse reactions. In the future, multicentre, large-scale randomized controlled trials should be conducted to further validate these conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.