ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Predictions of Small Intracranial Aneurysms' Rupture Risk with Ensemble Machine Learning Model (Super Learner): A Retrospective Study in Two Tertiary Hospitals in China.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This research aims to investigate the morphological, clinical and hemodynamic parameters influencing intracranial aneurysm rupture, develop a ensemble machine learning model (Super Learner) to predict its rupture risk. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed aneurysm patients from two hospitals. Five base learners-decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-were constructed based on demographic, hemodynamic and geometric parameters. A Super Learner model was subsequently constructed using ensemble learning algorithms, with all models validated on an independent external dataset. Results: The dataset comprised 97 patients in the training cohort, 42 in the internal validation cohort, and 86 in the external validation cohort. In the external validation cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) values: Super learner 0.94 (0.89-1.00), Random Forest 0.83 (0.76-0.91), XGBoost 0.93 (0.87-0.99), Support Vector Machine 0.82 (0.73-0.92), Decision Tree 0.84 (0.76-0.93), and k-Nearest Neighbors 0.51 (0.38-0.63). Conclusion: The Super Learner model outperforms individual models in both performance and stability for predicting intracranial aneurysm rupture risk. It has been robustly validated on an external dataset, demonstrating strong generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.