ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025
The quality of care and long-term mortality of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiac devices: a nationwide cohort study.
Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is a growing population with cardiac devices (pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy), but whether this influences quality of care and long-term mortality after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unknown. Methods and results: Patients in England and Wales between January 2005 and March 2019 with a diagnosis of STEMI were included from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project, Hospital Episode Statistics and mortality linkage to July 2021. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality over the study period, secondary outcomes were odds of undergoing reperfusion within guideline mandated timeframes. Multivariate cox-models compared all-cause mortality over specified time-periods and logistic regression models illustrated odds of undergoing reperfusion. 322 890 patients with STEMI were included, 2118 (0.7%) had a cardiac device at STEMI admission. Patients with cardiac devices were older (78 years old vs. 66 years old) and more often female (32% vs. 29%) ( Conclusion: Patients with cardiac devices were less likely to undergo revascularization for STEMI within guideline mandated timeframes. They remain at elevated risk of all-cause mortality up to 5-years compared with STEMI patients without cardiac devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.