Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210162›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025

Safety and functional evaluation of a synthetic lamina cover that replaces lost autologous spinal bone after laminectomy, in a sheep and human study.

Cheng-Kuang Chen, Ming-Fu Chiang, Yu-Cheng Yao, Ming-Chau Chang, Axel H Schönthal, Thomas C Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cheng-Kuang ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, No. 95, Wenchang Rd., Shilin District, Taipei City 111045, Taiwan.
Ming-Fu ChiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fu-Jen Catholic University Hospital, No. 69, Guizi Rd., Taishan District, New Taipei City 24352, Taiwan.
Yu-Cheng YaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Section 2, Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei City 112201, Taiwan.
Ming-Chau ChangDepartment of Orthopedics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Section 2, Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei City 112201, Taiwan.
Axel H SchönthalDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2011 Zonal Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90033, United States.
Thomas C ChenOrion Biotech, Inc., Rm 1, 5F-1, No. 88, Sec. 2, Chongqing N. Rd., Datong District, Taipei City 103, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Laminectomies involve removal of the lamina, usually to relieve pressure on the spinal cord. We are developing a synthetic lamina cover (SLC) that can replace the resected bone, functioning as an artificial shield, with the objective to minimize common postsurgical risks associated with laminectomies. The SLC is designed to be affixed to a common pedicle screw fixation system. Methods: Lumbar laminectomies with posterior fusions were performed in 6 sheep and 30 human patients. Both cohorts were separated into 2 groups, where 1 group received the SLC to replace the lamina, whereas the other group did not. Otherwise, postsurgical care and medical attention were the same in both groups. After 26 weeks, the sheep were euthanized and histopathological and histomorphometrical evaluation of spine sections was performed. Human patients were followed for up to 6 months, and functional recovery was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire. Results: In sheep, the overall host tissue response was minimal, without any signs of irritation, inflammation, or aberrant changes potentially caused by the SLC. Human patients that had received the SLC reported better and faster functional recovery (p<.05) than the group without the SLC. Neither patient group experienced complications from surgery. Conclusions: Application of the SLC was safe and showed benefit as a shield to replace the autologous spinal lamina postlaminectomy. In its presence, functional recovery not only was faster, but also overall more pronounced.

Indexed as

Chronic back painDural adhesionLamina coverLaminectomySpine protection deviceSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID41210162
PMCPMC12590038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.