ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2025
Traditional and Artificial Intelligent Methods in Predicting Maxillofacial Soft Tissue Morphology After Orthognathic Surgery: A Narrative Review.
Review in International journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies in Orthognathic and Reconstructive Maxillofacial Surgery: Data Availability and Evidence Maturity.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Prediction of Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Changes Following Mandibular PEEK Implantation (Proof of Concept).Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Soft-tissue thickness changes following bimaxillary surgery in skeletal class II malocclusion.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The soft tissue morphology after orthognathic surgery has always been difficult to predict in preoperative planning. This narrative review aims to evaluate the current prediction methods and point out the direction for future research to improve predicting accuracy and speed. PubMed was the database for the review. The keywords for searching include: orthognathic surgery, prediction methods, simulation methods, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), soft tissue, and surgical planning. Sixty-seven articles were found and 60 relevant articles were evaluated. The review finds out that with the transition from two-dimensional (2D) prediction to three-dimensional (3D) prediction, AI algorithms, especially DL methods, are brought forward promisingly, such as deep neural network (DNN), PointNet, and Transformer. DL methods have the advantages of high accuracy, fast speed, and simplified use, therefore have broad development prospects. However, DL methods need to be further improved, mainly in data insufficiency, overfitting, and the lack of interpretability. To conclude, the review proposes methods that could improve the accuracy and availability of prediction by DL, such as learning from large and high-quality databases, establishing separate databases for groups with different features, optimizing and simplifying the algorithm structure, utilizing integrated multimodal data, and implementing visualization techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.