Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210159›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2025

Analyzing Verrucopapillary Lesions of the Oral Cavity: Retracing the Clinicopathological Conundrum.

Neetu Jain, Shashi Keshwar, Ashish Shrestha, Navin Agrawal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Neetu JainDepartment of Oral Pathology, College of Dental Surgery, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4292-6074
Shashi KeshwarDepartment of Oral Pathology, College of Dental Surgery, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3638-5849
Ashish ShresthaDepartment of Oral Pathology, College of Dental Surgery, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1317-0522
Navin AgrawalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Surgery, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7082-576X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In oral cavity, verrucous papillary lesions (VPLs) can be challenging to diagnose both clinically and histopathologically as they share common overlapping features. The most reported VPLs are verrucous carcinoma (VC), verrucous hyperplasia (VH), and squamous papilloma (SP). Inaccurate diagnosis may lead to suboptimal patient outcomes. Objective: To evaluate and compare clinicopathological features of reported VPLs to support accurate diagnosis and patient management. Materials and Methods: 10-year retrospective archival with the histopathologic diagnoses of VPLs was taken. A detailed examination of clinical and histopathological data was compared. Results: VC, followed by VH and SP, were the most reported cases. The koilocytic appearance in all cases points towards the viral association of SP. On the other hand, VH and VC seemed to be habit related. It was easy to diagnose SP and verruciform xanthoma (VX). However, VH and VC presented some overlapping features. Also, variations from ideal characteristics were evident in cases of VC. Conclusion: The study emphasizes the importance of an accurate biopsy and the accurate diagnosis of benign to malignant VPLs lesions for better treatment and prognosis for the patient.

Indexed as

biopsyprognosissquamous cell carcinomaverrucous carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41210159
PMCPMC12595221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.