ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2025
Biomechanical Differences Between Ipsilateral and Contralateral Change-Of- Direction Movements Using the Same Planting Foot in Recreational Team Sport Players.
Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of Anticipation on Neuromuscular Control During a Single-Leg Diagonal Drop Jump Landing Task In Female Football Players. A Cross-Sectional Study.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Change-of-direction (COD) movements are critical for predicting injury risk or identify sport performance. Multiple studies have examined contralateral COD (contra-COD) comprehensively, but few studies have examined ipsilateral COD (ipsi-COD). This study investigated the kinetic and kinematic parameters of the same planting foot during ipsi-COD and contra-COD movements. In total, 29 recreational team sport players performed 60° ipsi-COD and contra-COD movements. Biomechanical data were collected using a three-dimensional force plate and a motion capture system. The ipsi-COD task exhibited a 6% shorter contact time than the contra-COD task. In addition, ipsi-COD resulted in a significantly greater ankle pronation-supination range (+27%), smaller inversion-eversion range (-19%), and decreased plantarflexion-dorsiflexion range (-37%). Lower ground reaction forces (horizontal: -14%, vertical: -32%, resultant: -14% to -279%) and impulse values (horizontal: -24%, vertical: -23%, resultant: -24%) were observed for ipsi-CODs than for contra-CODs. The musculoskeletal structure of the lower limbs provides an anatomical advantage for excessive eversion during ipsi-COD, leading to a more rounded execution path compared with contra-COD. The differences in contact time, ankle range of motion, and ground reaction force in ipsi-COD may result from joint alignment, force application techniques, and movement execution strategies. The observed phenomenon of shorter contact time with lower ground reaction force and smaller ankle range in ipsi-COD offers new insights for future studies investigating COD mechanics across different movement contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.