Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210052›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Primary Malignant Mesothelioma of the Tunica Vaginalis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Amgad Elmadani, Ahmed Farag, Zubair Al-Qassim, Roland England

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amgad ElmadaniUrology, Kettering General Hospital NHS Trust, Kettering, GBR.
Ahmed FaragUrology, Kettering General Hospital NHS Trust, Kettering, GBR.
Zubair Al-QassimUrology, Kettering General Hospital NHS Trust, Kettering, GBR.
Roland EnglandUrology, Kettering General Hospital NHS Trust, Kettering, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis is an extremely rare neoplasm, and its diagnosis is often unclear initially due to its nonspecific presentation. We present the case of an 87-year-old gentleman who presented with a left-sided hydrocele that increased in size over seven months, with no associated history of asbestos exposure. On initial ultrasound, he had a benign appearing hydrocele and proceeded to hydrocelectomy, where suspicious lesions were noticed and sent for histopathology. A subsequent radical inguinal orchiectomy was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed malignant mesothelioma, which was positive for calretinin, Wilm's Tumour 1 (WT-1), AE1/AE3, and D2-40 immunohistochemically, from both operations. On postoperative staging, no metastases were seen, and the patient has been disease-free on follow-up after six months. This case illustrates the challenges in reaching the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis and emphasizes the importance of timely surgical intervention in the form of radical orchidectomy and histological examination of any uncommon scrotal mass. Ongoing case reporting is needed to guide management, as there are no standard guidelines due to the limited number of reported cases.

Indexed as

hydroceleinguinal orchidectomymalignant mesotheliomatesticular swellingtunica vaginalis tumor

Identifiers

PMID41210052
PMCPMC12592738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.