ArticleCureus2025
Primary Malignant Mesothelioma of the Tunica Vaginalis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis is an extremely rare neoplasm, and its diagnosis is often unclear initially due to its nonspecific presentation. We present the case of an 87-year-old gentleman who presented with a left-sided hydrocele that increased in size over seven months, with no associated history of asbestos exposure. On initial ultrasound, he had a benign appearing hydrocele and proceeded to hydrocelectomy, where suspicious lesions were noticed and sent for histopathology. A subsequent radical inguinal orchiectomy was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed malignant mesothelioma, which was positive for calretinin, Wilm's Tumour 1 (WT-1), AE1/AE3, and D2-40 immunohistochemically, from both operations. On postoperative staging, no metastases were seen, and the patient has been disease-free on follow-up after six months. This case illustrates the challenges in reaching the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis and emphasizes the importance of timely surgical intervention in the form of radical orchidectomy and histological examination of any uncommon scrotal mass. Ongoing case reporting is needed to guide management, as there are no standard guidelines due to the limited number of reported cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.