ReviewCureus2025
Impact of Comorbidity Burden on Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic utility of the Charlson comorbidity index in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Development of a prognostic nomogram for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis: a SEER database analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Older adults represent most patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), yet their management is often complicated by multimorbidity. Comorbid conditions may influence treatment selection, tolerance, and survival, but the prognostic role of comorbidity burden in mCRC remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between comorbidity, measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and clinical outcomes in older patients with mCRC. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (2000 to April 2025) for studies of adults aged ≥65 years with mCRC that assessed clinical outcomes according to baseline comorbidity, as measured by the CCI. Eligible endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Data were extracted in duplicate, and study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects models were applied to pool hazard ratios (HRs). Fourteen studies involving 16,736 patients met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies reported OS, two reported PFS, and two reported AEs. Higher comorbidity burden was significantly associated with worse OS (pooled HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.02-1.39; I² = 84.1%). No significant difference was observed for PFS (pooled HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.89-1.14; I² = 4.9%). For AEs, estimates were imprecise, with wide confidence intervals suggesting uncertainty about the association between high CCI and increased risk (pooled HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 0.79-3.79; I² = 86.4%). Multimorbidity, as measured by the CCI, is modestly associated with poorer overall survival in older mCRC patients (HR ≈ 1.19), but does not appear to influence progression-free survival or treatment-related toxicity consistently. Given the substantial heterogeneity across studies and the limited data on progression-free survival and adverse events, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, they suggest that comorbidity should guide, but not preclude, standard therapy, underscoring the importance of individualized, non-ageist treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.