ArticleCureus2025
Facial Emotion Analysis During Rehabilitation Treatment of a Patient With Acute Generalized Peritonitis and Delirium.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systemic review of facial expression recognition (FER) in stroke: diagnosis and emerging applications in rehabilitation.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rehabilitation treatment is known to improve not only physical function but also emotional well-being. However, objectively assessing emotions in critically ill patients with impaired consciousness by using conventional subjective measures is difficult. In this study, we focused on a specific method for analyzing emotions from facial expressions and aimed to perform facial emotion analysis in a single patient with delirium. The patient was a man in his 70s with acute generalized peritonitis who developed postoperative delirium. Rehabilitation treatment was initiated on the first day after surgery, and facial emotion analysis was performed before and after rehabilitation treatment on day 14. Five emotional factors (Neutral, Happy, Sad, Angry, and Surprised) were measured, and 38 measurements were taken during 19 sessions. Visual analog scale (VAS) and salivary α-amylase activity (sAA) levels were also measured 22 times in 11 sessions from day 30 until discharge. Throughout the imaging period, the Happy emotion increased significantly after training when compared with the period before training, whereas the Surprised emotion decreased significantly. Furthermore, during the delirium period, happiness showed an increasing trend following training, whereas other emotional factors tended to decline. The VAS score decreased after training, whereas sAA levels did not show a consistent change. These observations suggest that facial emotion analysis may be feasible as an objective adjunct, but its clinical utility and generalizability require confirmation in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.