ArticleCureus2025
A Study From Saudi Arabia: What Do Patients Value When Choosing an Ophthalmic Surgeon?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatient involvement in healthcare decision-making is a growing trend, influenced by a variety of factors, including a surgeon's reputation, experience, and digital presence. While much of the research has focused on general practitioners, there is limited literature on factors influencing patients' choices of ophthalmic surgeons, particularly in Saudi Arabia.
objectiveThis study aims to identify and assess the key factors influencing the selection of ophthalmic surgeons in Saudi Arabia. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted using a validated online questionnaire. The sample consisted of 627 participants from Saudi Arabia, with a range of demographic characteristics. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed, including logistic regression to identify predictors of surgeon selection.
resultsThe study found that the most influential factors in surgeon selection were the surgeon's reputation (96.5%; 95% CI: 94.7-97.8%), qualifications (93.1%; 95% CI: 91.0-95.0%), and patient satisfaction (94.4%; 95% CI: 92.5-96.1%). Gender preference was less significant (30.1%; 95% CI: 27.0-33.4%), while social media presence had a limited impact (23.8%; 95% CI: 20.9-26.9%). Personal recommendations from friends and family (45.4%) and physicians (33.5%) played a significant role. Proximity to the hospital and cost also influenced decisions, with geographic accessibility being a key predictor.
conclusionThe selection of ophthalmic surgeons in Saudi Arabia is primarily influenced by reputation, qualifications, and recommendations from trusted sources. Although social media and gender preferences were less influential, the findings highlight the complexity of patient decision-making and emphasize the importance of personalized care in a digital era. To facilitate more informed decision-making, healthcare institutions and professional associations could establish standardized platforms or databases that offer transparent access to surgeons' certifications and professional backgrounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.