ArticleCureus2025
Tailoring Anticoagulant Therapy: Managing Interactions Between Carbamazepine and Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs).
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard prophylaxis after hip surgery typically involves parenteral anticoagulation. However, this approach may not be feasible for patients with significant comorbidities or barriers to injectable treatments. Oral anticoagulants can be considered, but vitamin K antagonists present compliance concerns, and many direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are limited by drug interactions. A 61-year-old male care home resident with multiple comorbidities, including hypoxic brain injury-related seizures and a severe needle phobia, underwent right hip hemiarthroplasty after sustaining a femoral neck fracture. Parenteral thromboprophylaxis was not a viable option due to the needle phobia, and vitamin K antagonists were excluded because of adherence concerns. The patient's regular use of carbamazepine, a strong enzyme inducer, further complicated anticoagulant selection due to its potential to reduce DOAC effectiveness. After a multidisciplinary review, edoxaban was chosen as the most suitable option. The patient was managed with a daily regimen of edoxaban 60 mg, with therapeutic drug levels confirmed through monitoring. He remained clinically stable without thrombotic or bleeding complications. This case highlights the importance of an individualised approach to anticoagulation in complex patients, where both clinical context and drug interactions must be carefully considered and balanced. Edoxaban may represent a feasible strategy in patients receiving carbamazepine, provided that treatment is supported by plasma level monitoring and close follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.