ArticleCureus2025
Peoria Posterior Fossa Stroke Scale: A New Scale to Assess the Severity of Posterior Fossa Stroke Symptoms and Outcomes.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPosterior fossa strokes often present with symptoms that are less obvious and can overlap with other conditions. While the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) remains a valuable tool for stroke assessment, its limitations in posterior fossa strokes necessitate a complementary approach. A posterior fossa stroke scale developed with standard protocols for use in various settings, such as pre-hospital, emergency department, and inpatient care, could ensure early identification and timely treatment. For this reason, the Peoria Posterior Fossa Stroke Scale (PPFSS) was created with the objective of creating an add-on to the NIHSS to allow for the assessment of the possibility of a posterior fossa stroke by any healthcare provider. MATERIALS AND
methodsA literature review of peer-reviewed publications via PubMed was conducted to identify clinical signs and symptoms associated with posterior fossa strokes and existing posterior fossa stroke scales. A preliminary scale draft was created and formatted for easy bedside application, which was then discussed with a panel of five vascular fellowship-trained neurologists and later a neuro-ophthalmologist to create a finalized scale. Proposed scale: The PPFSS consists of a six-section scoring system with a range of scores of zero to 15 and includes sections that include eyes, nystagmus, head impulse, hearing, pharynx, and balance that would be used in the acute setting of those suspected to have posterior fossa strokes. Limitations and future directions: Further research into the PPFSS would need to be done to validate its use. This would include testing in real-world settings to determine the sensitivity and specificity of PPFSS in identifying posterior circulation strokes, inter-rater reliability as measured by Cohen's kappa, and comparison to other scoring systems. Cognitive dysfunction of the patient and interrater reliability may factor into the scoring of the PPFSS.
conclusionA standardized, easy-to-use approach for assessing posterior fossa strokes could ensure consistency in diagnosis and treatment across healthcare settings. The PPFSS was developed as a potentially usable scale at bedside in the acute stroke setting that is ready for a validation research study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.