Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209940›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Functional Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction in Kinematic vs Mechanical Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Wael A Rahman, Khalid Y Muqri, Hussam M Suhail, Mohammed M Shajri, Yazan Z Omar, Mohammed A Alahmari, Abdulrhman A Hakami, Rawan S Alotaibi, Nasser H Alowaimer, Mohammed S Alrehaili

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wael A RahmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Prince Mohammed Bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Riyadh, SAU.
Khalid Y MuqriDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Hussam M SuhailDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Mohammed M ShajriCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Yazan Z OmarCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Mohammed A AlahmariFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdulrhman A HakamiCollege of Medicine, Ibn Sina College of Medicine, Jeddah, SAU.
Rawan S AlotaibiCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, SAU.
Nasser H AlowaimerCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, SAU.
Mohammed S AlrehailiFaculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a standard treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis, yet up to 20% of patients remain dissatisfied. Alignment strategy is a critical determinant of outcomes. Mechanical alignment (MA) has long been the conventional approach, while kinematic alignment (KA) has gained attention for its potential to restore native knee anatomy and improve patient-centered results. This systematic review compared functional outcomes, patient satisfaction, and safety between KA and MA in primary TKA. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) through August 2025 identified randomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies reporting functional outcomes, patient-reported measures, satisfaction, or revision rates. Methodological quality was appraised using the Modified Downs and Black checklist. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, representing diverse populations and designs with moderate-to-high methodological quality (scores 22-25/28). KA demonstrated small-to-moderate short- to mid-term improvements in Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and early flexion range of motion, particularly in varus phenotypes and when joint line orientation was preserved. It was also associated with fewer soft-tissue releases and improved intraoperative balance. However, long-term follow-up showed convergence of outcomes, with equivalent survivorship and complication rates between KA and MA. Patient satisfaction trends favored KA during early recovery, though pooled evidence did not demonstrate consistent superiority. KA appears to provide meaningful short- to mid-term advantages in functional recovery, joint awareness, and satisfaction without compromising implant survival or safety, especially in varus-aligned patients when applied within restricted boundaries. Nevertheless, heterogeneity in surgical techniques and outcome reporting highlights the need for large, phenotype-stratified randomized trials with long-term follow-up to establish optimal alignment strategies in TKA.

Indexed as

functional outcomesimplant survivaljoint awarenesskinematic alignmentmechanical alignmentosteoarthritispatient satisfactionrevision ratessystematic reviewtotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41209940
PMCPMC12590092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.