ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of Coagulation Profile Alterations in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) Pneumoperitoneum.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic Stress Biomarkers and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Laparoscopic IPOM+ and Open Rives-Stoppa Repair for Ventral Incisional Hernia: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Preoperative and Postoperative Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Vitamin K-Dependent Blood Coagulation Factor Profiles in Patients Undergoing Cholecystectomy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Predictive Performance of a Serum sRAGE/sVEGFR-3 Dual-Biomarker Combination for Hypercoagulability Status in PediatricInternational journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimLaparoscopic cholecystectomy is commonly performed for the removal of the gallbladder. This widely performed minimally invasive surgical procedure requires the creation of a pneumoperitoneum by insufflation of carbon dioxide (CO₂), which may affect coagulation dynamics. The objective was to assess the impact of CO₂ pneumoperitoneum on coagulation parameters in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
methodsAll patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, aged between 18 and 60 years, were included in this prospective observational study. Post-operative samples were collected 6 h after the creation of pneumoperitoneum. The patients' blood samples were collected pre- and post-surgery and analyzed for D-dimer, blood coagulation profile, and international normalized ratio (INR).
resultsA total of 81 patients were enrolled in this research. A male dominance (59 {72.8%}) was noted with a male-to-female ratio of 2.7:1, with a mean age of 38.9±11.9 years. A decreased trend was observed in post-operative values of prothrombin time (PT) (pre-operative: 12.0±0.448 and post-operative: 11.8±0.458 s) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) (pre-operative: 30.0±2.13 and post-operative: 28.0±2.22 s), with ~1 s and 2 s, respectively. These changes were indicative of a procoagulant state. The INR (0.998±0.0379) and D-dimer (0.868±0.314) values were noted to increase significantly post-operatively.
conclusionLaparoscopic cholecystectomy with CO₂ pneumoperitoneum creates a mild, subclinical hypercoagulable state marked by shortened clotting times and elevated fibrin degradation products. This state rarely causes symptomatic thrombosis in low-risk patients but warrants vigilance and prophylaxis in those with additional risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.