Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209904›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Non-ECG-Gated Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: A Scoping Review.

Francis E O'Toole, Maryam Zaffer, Jessica Cohen, Mathew Allard, Chase M Kingsbury, Rohit Muralidhar, Robin J Jacobs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francis E O'TooleMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Maryam ZafferMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Jessica CohenMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Mathew AllardMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Chase M KingsburyMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Rohit MuralidharMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Robin J JacobsMedical Education, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping cardiology, with notable progress in calcium scoring for cardiovascular risk stratification. Emerging approaches now enable AI-driven scoring on non-ECG-gated chest CT, yet questions remain about comparative accuracy and real-world utility. This review synthesizes current work on AI applications in non-ECG-gated coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring and subsequent cardiac risk assessment. We outline typical model inputs, development strategies, performance characteristics, and use cases across diverse care settings. Across the literature, AI-generated CAC scores generally show strong agreement with manual methods and support effective risk stratification, while markedly reducing processing time and workflow burden. Reported classifications align with clinically relevant outcomes, suggesting the potential to enhance the early identification of at-risk patients and streamline population-level screening. Despite promising results, heterogeneity in datasets, evaluation metrics, and deployment environments limits head-to-head comparisons and broad generalization. Implementation challenges, including image quality variation, integration with reporting pipelines, and oversight of edge cases, also warrant attention. Overall, AI for non-ECG-gated CAC scoring appears accurate, efficient, and clinically useful, with meaningful potential to improve cardiovascular risk assessment when thoughtfully validated and integrated into routine practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (ai)cardiovascular risk stratificationcoronary artery calcium (cac) scoringdeep learning (dl)machine learning (ml)non-ecg-gated ct

Identifiers

PMID41209904
PMCPMC12590512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.