Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209888›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Outcomes of a Novel Positioning Technique for Ophthalmic Surgery in Patients With Atypical Anatomy.

Jordan Jensen, Nikki Gill, William A White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jordan JensenOphthalmology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Prairie Village, USA.
Nikki GillOphthalmology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Prairie Village, USA.
William A WhiteOphthalmology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Prairie Village, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cataract extraction surgery, patient positioning and surgeon comfort are necessary for success. The patient's head must be flat and parallel to the floor to minimize complications and permit the use of a standard ophthalmic microscope. This position is often difficult in patients with spinal abnormalities, such as age-related hyperkyphosis or the exaggeration of the thoracic spine curvature. Multiple methods have been proposed to improve positioning in patients with spinal abnormalities. While these positions benefit the patient, they are often uncomfortable for the surgeon due to a lack of space or increased difficulty during the surgery. We propose a new surgical stool that, when used with the Trendelenburg position, can optimize patient positioning and surgeon comfort without increasing the risk of complications.  A retrospective chart review was conducted of eight patients (15 eyes) with spinal deformities that necessitated the proposed positioning for cataract surgery. The measured outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal edema, non-centered lens placement, retained native lens material, and cystoid macular edema (CME). Immediate postoperative outcomes, such as cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), capsular membrane rupture, use of Malyugin ring or iris hooks, and placement of wound sutures, were measured as surrogates of surgery difficulty.  Analysis demonstrated that the outcomes of patients with hyperkyphosis who underwent cataract surgery with the novel positioning were non-inferior to the outcomes of standard cataract surgery on non-hyperkyphotic patients. There was also no apparent difference in qualitative outcomes between the two groups. This pilot study shows that our novel positioning method provides a cost-effective alternative for ophthalmic surgery in patients with hyperkyphosis without increased risk of complications.

Indexed as

cataract surgerykyphosisspinal deformitiessurgical outcomessurgical positioning

Identifiers

PMID41209888
PMCPMC12594286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.