ArticleCureus2025
Assessing the Educational Impact of Dissection Competitions on Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Dissection competitions have recently emerged as a novel approach integrating traditional dissection practices with a competitive, problem-based learning model. This approach not only reinforces anatomical knowledge through hands-on experience but also introduces elements of competition to create a more stimulating and engaging learning environment. Hence we aimed at evaluating the educational impact of dissection competitions among first-year MBBS students. Methods The study was conducted among 158 first year MBBS students at AIIMS Kalyani using a Google Form questionnaire. A mixed-methods research design was employed in this study. Quantitative data were collected through structured feedback forms that measured various aspects of the competition, including overall satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and the relevance of the competition format to students' studies. In addition, qualitative data were gathered from open-ended responses, providing deeper insights into the students' experiences, perceived benefits, and suggestions for future improvements. Results The findings from the structured feedback and thematic analysis revealed that dissection competitions significantly enhance students' understanding of anatomical concepts. Additionally, the competitive and collaborative nature of the event helped foster critical skills such as teamwork, effective communication, and problem-solving, which are crucial for future medical professionals. Conclusion The findings of this study would provide valuable insights into the benefits of integrating dissection competitions into the medical curriculum. The results suggest that such competitions are not only effective in enhancing anatomy education but also in developing essential skills needed for medical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.