ReviewCureus2025
An Expert Opinion on Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Indian Facial Aesthetics: Insights From a Pre-meeting Questionnaire and Ad-Board Discussion.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This expert opinion explored aesthetic concerns among Indian participants, consolidating insights on physicians' clinical needs assessments with patients' self-identified concerns. Data was gathered through a pre-meeting survey distributed to 12 respondents. The findings revealed that physicians and patients consistently prioritize areas such as the infraorbital hollow in younger participants, while concerns shift toward volume loss and skin laxity in older age groups. Physicians often emphasize structural changes, such as malar bone resorption and jawline contouring. In contrast, patients frequently express concerns about visible signs of aging, including nasolabial folds, marionette lines, and neck skin laxity. The Assessment, Anatomy, Range, and Treatment (AART™) and Holistic Individualized Treatments (HITs™) enable practitioners to conduct thorough facial assessments and create tailored treatment plans. Considering both anatomical changes and patient expectations, an individualized approach to facial aesthetic treatments is necessary. There is a need for Indian-specific aesthetic guidelines owing to limited published literature that respects cultural facial characteristics and evolving beauty standards across age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.