ReviewCureus2025
Beyond Ursodeoxycholic Acid: A Comprehensive Review of Second-Line Agents in Primary Biliary Cholangitis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Comprehensive Review.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Review
- The Role of Laboratory Markers in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Clinical Review and a Case Report.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: unraveling mechanisms and advancing surveillance and chemoprevention.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune liver disease characterised by progressive bile duct injury and cholestasis. It predominantly affects middle-aged women and typically presents with symptoms such as fatigue, pruritus, and deranged liver enzymes. While ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) remains the first-line therapy, a significant proportion of patients fail to achieve adequate biochemical response, leaving them vulnerable to disease progression. Until recently, treatment options for these individuals in the United Kingdom (UK) were limited. However, the therapeutic landscape is evolving with the recent approval of elafibranor and seladelpar, offering new hope for patients and clinicians alike. This review highlights key characteristics of these emerging second-line agents, including their mechanisms of action, administration, safety profiles, and regulatory status in the UK. Special attention is given to the clinical implications of their approval and accessibility within NHS pathways. In addition to disease-modifying therapies, adjunctive strategies for symptom control, particularly for pruritus and fatigue, are also discussed, along with a brief overview of future therapeutic directions. By summarising the expanding treatment arsenal, this review aims to support evidence-informed decision-making and promote timely specialist referral in patients with suboptimal response to UDCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.