ReviewPCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025
Network-Pluralistic Psychiatry in Epilepsy: A theoretical framework and research agenda for personalized, mechanistic, and integrated care.
Review in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Network-Pluralistic Psychiatry in Epilepsy: A theoretical framework and research agenda for personalized, mechanistic, and integrated care.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy are prevalent, disabling, and persistently undertreated due to conceptual and operational fragmentation between neurology and psychiatry. This paper proposes Network-Pluralistic Psychiatry in Epilepsy (NPPE), a hypothesis-generating, disease-contextualized framework that integrates four mechanistic layers: (1) shared genetic vulnerability, (2) epileptogenic network dysfunction as a neuropsychiatric substrate, (3) a bidirectional psychosocial stress loop, and (4) societal and institutional amplifiers. NPPE moves beyond high-level biopsychosocial heuristics by positing testable causal pathways linking genetic liability to network instability, symptom expression, and environmental feedback in epilepsy. The manuscript situates NPPE within existing integrated-care paradigms (e.g., collaborative and stepped-care models), proposing NPPE as a mechanistic engine to personalize measurement-based treatment-to-target decisions while explicitly acknowledging feasibility constraints for advanced tools. A tiered assessment concept (Tiers 1-3) and candidate mechanism-informed interventions are outlined as research targets rather than clinical recommendations. The paper delineates a research agenda prioritizing longitudinal, multimodal cohorts; incorporation of network biomarkers in clinical trials; evaluation of integrated-care implementations; and attention to equity and real-world feasibility. NPPE aims to provide a coherent, testable roadmap to transform descriptive comorbidity accounts into mechanism-oriented, personalized neuropsychiatric care in epilepsy, contingent on rigorous validation, refinement, or falsification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.