ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The differential effects of dynamic, static, and combined activities in forest bathing on health outcomes by gender in older adults: evidence from a national forest park trial.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparing guided and unguided forest bathing for graduate student stress management: a pilot study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Forest bathing, as a form of natural therapy, has been increasingly recognized for its therapeutic effects on physiological and psychological health. National parks, as protected natural environments, provide ideal settings for such interventions, yet empirical studies conducted directly within these landscapes remain limited. Objective: This study aims to compare the effects of dynamic, static, and combined dynamic-static activities on the health outcomes of older adult populations of different genders, within a real national park environment. Methods: Seventy-two middle-aged and older adults (mean age 62.5 ± 7.22 years) were divided into four groups: combined dynamic-static, dynamic, static, and control. Physiological (EEG, HR, skin conductance, SBP, DBP) and psychological indicators (BPOMS, PRS) were measured. Results: The combined dynamic-static group showed the best overall improvements, particularly in positive emotions and blood pressure. The dynamic group excelled in diastolic pressure and perceived restoration, while the static group improved vitality and reduced fatigue. Males showed more physiological improvements, whereas females excelled in psychological restoration across all activities. Significance: Conducted in the ecologically rich Panda Valley of Shaanxi Province -a core area of the Giant Panda National Park-this study provides real- world evidence that national parks serve as effective therapeutic landscapes. It offers scientific justification for integrating nature-based therapies into public health strategies and enhancing the health value of national parks. Conclusion: Forest bathing activities within national parks can serve as a powerful natural therapy for promoting older adult health, tailored by activity type and gender.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.