Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209794›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025

Existential anxiety, psychological flexibility, and deep resilience to climate crises.

Carl F Weems, Cristina Poleacovsch, Scott Feinstein, Marcus Nartey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carl F WeemsDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Cristina PoleacovschDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Scott FeinsteinDepartment of Political Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Marcus NarteyDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns and uncertainty about the viability of continued existence on the planet are central to the urgency of the climate crisis and can be contextualized within the philosophical idea of existential anxiety. The goal of this conceptual analysis is to outline how existential anxiety and psychological flexibility may help in understanding reactions to climate crises and thereby facilitate what has been termed "deep resilience." This paper offers a definition of deep resilience that may be operationalized and measured, incorporating the concepts of existential anxiety and psychological flexibility. Simply put, deep resilience is multilayered, multiscale flexibility and adaptation to existential threat. Broadly, deep resilience involves flexible adaptation at the individual, family, community, societal, and geographical scales in response to existential threats to individuals, families, communities, societies, geographical regions, and the planet itself. The paper explores the conceptual and empirical foundations for these concepts as a potential basis for defining, acting toward, and actualizing deep resilience. Examples from the empirical literature spanning psychological, climate-related, and political domains are discussed, with avenues for future research and policy noted.

Indexed as

climatecrisisdeep resilienceexistential anxietypsychological flexibility

Identifiers

PMID41209794
PMCPMC12590975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.