ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Students with inattention and their experiences of autonomy in learning activities: an interview study with two students and their teachers.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neurodiversity-affirming SEA for ADHD: evaluation of an online program for parents and children in the ultra-orthodox Jewish community.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to explore how students diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) experience autonomy in learning activities. The study was conducted within the framework of a one-year school-based intervention using an autonomy supportive learning model that included elements of adapted education, self-regulated learning, and teacher autonomy support. Method: Two students with inattention and two teachers were interviewed about their experiences in the context of the learning model. The interviews were inductively analyzed and self-determination theory proved useful in adding meaning to the students' experiences. Results: Analysis showed that in a context that supports their autonomy, the students at times experienced being able to volitionally maintain their concentration. Autonomy support allowed them to address their own needs in terms of interest, enjoyment, and the need for breaks, leading to experiences which can be interpreted as both intrinsic motivation and autonomous extrinsic motivation. Furthermore, ongoing dialogical interactions between students and teachers were highlighted as beneficial to students' subsequent self-reflections about their needs and what they require to act autonomously in learning activities. However, the expectations of being autonomous learners were at times experienced as a challenge for the students, indicating that autonomy in learning activities that rely on self-regulation might constitute a double-edged sword for students with ADHD. A key contribution of this study lies in its novel application of self-determination theory (SDT) to understand the broader conceptualizations of motivation-particularly internal motives of students with ADHD in mainstream educational settings-responding to recent calls for research that moves beyond deficit-based perspectives. Implications include a need for teachers to increase their competency in differentiated autonomy support. Teachers' ongoing dialogic interaction with students about their experiences, needs and interests in learning activities should also be a central part of teachers' competency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.