Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209792›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Students with inattention and their experiences of autonomy in learning activities: an interview study with two students and their teachers.

Marit Uthus, Audhild Løhre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marit UthusDepartment of Education and Lifelong Learning, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Audhild LøhreDepartment of Teacher Education, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to explore how students diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) experience autonomy in learning activities. The study was conducted within the framework of a one-year school-based intervention using an autonomy supportive learning model that included elements of adapted education, self-regulated learning, and teacher autonomy support. Method: Two students with inattention and two teachers were interviewed about their experiences in the context of the learning model. The interviews were inductively analyzed and self-determination theory proved useful in adding meaning to the students' experiences. Results: Analysis showed that in a context that supports their autonomy, the students at times experienced being able to volitionally maintain their concentration. Autonomy support allowed them to address their own needs in terms of interest, enjoyment, and the need for breaks, leading to experiences which can be interpreted as both intrinsic motivation and autonomous extrinsic motivation. Furthermore, ongoing dialogical interactions between students and teachers were highlighted as beneficial to students' subsequent self-reflections about their needs and what they require to act autonomously in learning activities. However, the expectations of being autonomous learners were at times experienced as a challenge for the students, indicating that autonomy in learning activities that rely on self-regulation might constitute a double-edged sword for students with ADHD. A key contribution of this study lies in its novel application of self-determination theory (SDT) to understand the broader conceptualizations of motivation-particularly internal motives of students with ADHD in mainstream educational settings-responding to recent calls for research that moves beyond deficit-based perspectives. Implications include a need for teachers to increase their competency in differentiated autonomy support. Teachers' ongoing dialogic interaction with students about their experiences, needs and interests in learning activities should also be a central part of teachers' competency.

Indexed as

attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)autonomy supportconcentrationinattentionmotivationstudent autonomyvolition

Identifiers

PMID41209792
PMCPMC12593520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.