Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209746›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2025

Evaluation of Tuina Combined with Medicated Oil in Non-Specific Low Back Pain Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Siyu Wang, Man Yuan, Guangxin Guo, Trinh Thach Thi Nguyen, Yannan Zheng, Zhiyang Yin, Yongwei Wang, Fei Yao, Guimao Wang, Hongxi Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Siyu Wang *Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Man Yuan *School of Pharmacy, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Guangxin Guo *Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2081-5229
Trinh Thach Thi NguyenSchool of Pharmacy, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yannan ZhengSchool of Pharmacy, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zhiyang YinSchool of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yongwei WangSchool of Pharmacy, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Fei YaoShanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Guimao WangShanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hongxi XuSchool of Pharmacy, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) causes functional impairments and reduced quality of life. Evidence for non-pharmacological approaches, such as Tuina and Flying Eagle Wood Lok Medicated Oil (TNO), remains limited. This study compares the efficacy of TNO and Tuina with water (TNW). Patients and Methods: This single-center, open-label, evaluator-blinded randomized controlled trial (June 2023 - June 2025) was conducted at Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine with 100 participants aged 20-59 years, diagnosed with NSLBP based on the North American Spine Society criteria. The Ethics Committee (2023SHL-KY-96-01) approves the study, and assessors are blinded to group assignments for objective evaluations. All participants provided informed consent and completed the study. The trial group received TNO treatment thrice weekly for 4 weeks, with 20-minute follow-up sessions, compared to TNW. The primary outcome was the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, with secondary outcomes (JOA scores, Infrared Thermography, muscle tension, and tenderness scores). Adverse reactions were recorded for safety assessment. Results: This trial recruited 100 patients (mean [SD] age, 35.0 [5.2] years; 57 [57%] female) who were randomized into two groups. One hundred percent of patients completed all outcome measurements. The mean difference in VAS scores from baseline at week 8 for the TNO group was -4.48 (95% CI, -4.89 to -4.07). At week 8, the difference in JOA scores for the TNO groups was 10.8 (95% CI, 10.12 to 11.48; P <0.001). The effectiveness remained at the follow-up. LC-MS analysis identified 621 compounds (Negative: 258, Positive: 363). Conclusion: This study found that TNO was more effective than Tuina alone, with improved pain, muscle tension, tenderness, and thermal imaging at 8 weeks. Thus, this combination should be considered for the treatment of non-specific low back pain. The short follow-up period (8 weeks), the single-center design, and the absence of a placebo oil group are significant limitations that may restrict generalizability. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: : ChiCTR2300076144.

Indexed as

back painclinical trialmedicated oilnon-specific low back painTuina

Identifiers

PMID41209746
PMCPMC12593860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.