Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209688›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2025

Exercise, manipulation and traction physiotherapy in the conservative management of lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Santhosh G Thavarajasingam, Daniele S C Ramsay, Srikar R Namireddy, Abith G Kamath, Sree Kanakala, Hasan Zaidi, Rishi Parikh, Amaan Peerbhai, Hariharan Subbiah Ponniah, Aksaan Arif and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Santhosh G ThavarajasingamImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniele S C RamsayImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Srikar R NamireddyImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abith G KamathImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sree KanakalaImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Hasan ZaidiImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rishi ParikhImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amaan PeerbhaiImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Hariharan Subbiah PonniahImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Aksaan ArifImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ahmed SalihImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ahkash ThavarajasingamImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan NeuhoffCenter for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Daniel ScurtuImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Dragan JankovicDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas KramerDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian RingelDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a leading cause of global back pain with significant socioeconomic impact. Conservative physiotherapy, including exercise, manipulation, and traction therapies, is a common first-line treatment. However, their relative efficacy and applicability to specific subgroups remain unclear. Research question: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of these three modalities, identified factors influencing variability, and explored subgroup-specific applications. Material and methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted with searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, Scopus, and grey literature. Forty-three studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and 20 in the meta-analysis. Random-effects models estimated pooled standardized mean changes (SMCs), and meta-regression examined covariates influencing variability. Results: The pooled SMC across modalities was 2.28 (95 % CI: 1.51, 3.05), indicating large treatment effects, though heterogeneity was high (I Discussion and conclusion: Conservative therapies may effectively reduce LDH-related pain and disability, with traction therapy demonstrating the largest pooled effect size. High heterogeneity and methodological inconsistencies limit subgroup-specific recommendations. Rigorous trials and standardized methodologies are essential for optimizing evidence-based care for LDH patients.

Indexed as

Conservative treatmentExercise therapyLumbar disc herniationManipulation therapyMeta-analysisPhysiotherapySystematic reviewTraction therapy

Identifiers

PMID41209688
PMCPMC12595123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.