ArticleBrain & spine2025
Endoscopic pre-subtemporal keyhole approach: Anatomical feasibility and clinical applications [SevEN-016].
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) are routinely used to resect skull base lesion. However, they are laterally restricted when addressing lesions that extend into the petroclival region or lateral brainstem. Research question: Is the endoscopic pre-subtemporal keyhole approach (EPSKA) effective for accessing and treating skull base lesions? Material and methods: Twelve sides of six cadaveric heads were dissected to simulate the EPSKA. This technique combines standard subtemporal keyhole craniotomy with an additional inferomedial subtemporal bone window. Following assessment of the anatomical feasibility, the approach was applied to clinical cases. Results: Cadaveric dissections confirmed that the EPSKA provided safe access to critical neurovascular structures within the anterior tentorial incisural space, petroclival region, and ventrolateral surface of the pons. The approach was subsequently applied in ten patients: eight with meningiomas, one with an epidermoid cyst, and one with a cavernous malformation. Gross total resection was achieved in four cases, near total resection in two cases, and subtotal resection in four cases. Postoperative neurological improvement was observed in nine patients. No permanent neurological deterioration or temporal muscle atrophy were observed. Discussion and conclusion: EPSKA provides a safe and minimally invasive corridor for the anterior tentorial incisural space, petroclival region, and ventrolateral pons. Cadaveric validation and clinical application demonstrated that this approach provides sufficient surgical exposure and allows for efficient manipulation of endoscopic instruments, while preserving temporal lobe integrity and minimizing temporalis muscle injury. EPSKA may serve as a valuable surgical option in selected cases that require focused access to deep-seated skull base lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.