Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209670›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2026

Knowledge and Practice Behaviors of Community-Based Resident Physicians Surrounding Cancer Screening.

Paige Bentley, Madison Bieganski, Kevin Eells, Zachary Ryan, Isain Zapata, Joel Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paige BentleyRocky Vista University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Englewood, Colorado.
Madison BieganskiRocky Vista University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Englewood, Colorado.
Kevin EellsRocky Vista University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Englewood, Colorado.
Zachary RyanRocky Vista University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Englewood, Colorado.
Isain ZapataDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Rocky Vista University, Englewood, Colorado.
Joel RobertsMaster of Science in Biomedical Sciences, Rocky Vista University, Englewood, Colorado.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer screening programs have significantly reduced mortality rates associated with cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers over the past few decades. However, inconsistencies in screening guidelines among healthcare providers raise concerns about the uniformity of recommendations. Methods: This study uses a survey to investigate the practice behaviors and knowledge of cancer screening guidelines among medical residents in family medicine, internal medicine, and general surgery community-based residency programs in the state of Colorado. A multi-institution survey was conducted, with 72 resident physicians participating. The study explores the sources from which residents acquire screening guidelines and evaluates their accuracy in recommending screening ages for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancers. Results: Results indicate a preference for guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, although there are variations in recommendations among specialties. Although residents demonstrate good knowledge of cervical cancer screening, they exhibit inconsistencies in breast cancer screening ages. Conflicting guidelines are perceived to impact patients' quality of care and confidence in the healthcare system. Residents primarily learn screening recommendations during medical school, highlighting the importance of early education. Conclusions: The study underscores the need for streamlined and consistent guidelines to mitigate confusion among providers and patients. Further research is recommended to explore the objective impacts of guideline variability on screening practices and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

cancer screeningKnowledgepatient trustresidency program

Identifiers

PMID41209670
PMCPMC12593650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.