Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41209664›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025

Pupils' and teachers' experiences with implementing standing desks in secondary schools in Belgium.

Veerle Van Oeckel, Benedicte Deforche, Marijke Miatton, Louise Poppe, Maïté Verloigne

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04327414 (The Effect of Standing Desks in Secondary Schools on Sedentary Behavior and Cognitive Performance in Flemish Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04327414 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Standing Desks in Secondary Schools on Sedentary Behavior and Cognitive Performance in Flemish Adolescents

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity GhentRan2020 to 2020Enrolled125ConditionsSedentary BehaviorArmsIntervention group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Veerle Van OeckelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Benedicte DeforcheDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Marijke MiattonDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Louise PoppeDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Maïté VerloigneDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Sedentary behaviour is associated with adverse health outcomes in adolescents, yet adolescents spend most of their day sedentary, particularly at school. Standing desks have been proposed to reduce sitting time, but implementation challenges remain. This pilot study evaluated the process of implementing standing desks in secondary schools. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted from September to December 2020 in Flanders, Belgium, in three schools, each including one 7th- or 8th-grade class. Ten standing desks were used for 4-5 weeks in each class. Implementation was assessed retrospectively using pupil focus groups, teacher interviews, and pupil questionnaires. Qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Questionnaire data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results: A convenience sample of 58 out of 68 pupils (mean age 13.0 ± 0.7 years, 44.8 % boys) completed the questionnaire. Pupils reported using the standing desks on average 8.9 ± 5.4 h/week, with qualitative data revealing a decline in use over time. Furthermore, experiences of using standing desks among pupils and teachers varied: some reported better concentration among pupils, while others mentioned discomfort, fatigue, and distractions. Conclusions: Implementing standing desks resulted in mixed experiences among pupils and teachers. Future interventions should encourage gradual increases in standing time and frequent posture changes. Trial registration: This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov in January 2020 (NCT04327414; released on March 11, 2020).

Identifiers

PMID41209664
PMCPMC12594943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.