ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Pupils' and teachers' experiences with implementing standing desks in secondary schools in Belgium.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04327414 (The Effect of Standing Desks in Secondary Schools on Sedentary Behavior and Cognitive Performance in Flemish Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Standing Desks in Secondary Schools on Sedentary Behavior and Cognitive Performance in Flemish Adolescents
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pupils' and teachers' experiences with implementing standing desks in secondary schools in Belgium.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Sedentary behaviour is associated with adverse health outcomes in adolescents, yet adolescents spend most of their day sedentary, particularly at school. Standing desks have been proposed to reduce sitting time, but implementation challenges remain. This pilot study evaluated the process of implementing standing desks in secondary schools. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted from September to December 2020 in Flanders, Belgium, in three schools, each including one 7th- or 8th-grade class. Ten standing desks were used for 4-5 weeks in each class. Implementation was assessed retrospectively using pupil focus groups, teacher interviews, and pupil questionnaires. Qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Questionnaire data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results: A convenience sample of 58 out of 68 pupils (mean age 13.0 ± 0.7 years, 44.8 % boys) completed the questionnaire. Pupils reported using the standing desks on average 8.9 ± 5.4 h/week, with qualitative data revealing a decline in use over time. Furthermore, experiences of using standing desks among pupils and teachers varied: some reported better concentration among pupils, while others mentioned discomfort, fatigue, and distractions. Conclusions: Implementing standing desks resulted in mixed experiences among pupils and teachers. Future interventions should encourage gradual increases in standing time and frequent posture changes. Trial registration: This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov in January 2020 (NCT04327414; released on March 11, 2020).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.