ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
The treatment efficacy of complete decongestive therapy for breast cancer-related lymphedema from the perspective of skin mechanical properties: a case study.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To quantitatively assess skin mechanical properties in a case of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) and examine their clinical utility. [Participant and Methods] A 69-year-old female was diagnosed with BCRL of the left upper extremity. In this case, the patient was admitted to our institute for two weeks of intensive lymphedema drainage. Complex decongestive therapy (CDT), the standard treatment for lymphedema, was administered during hospitalization. Pre-intervention and at one- and two-weeks post-intervention, circumferential diameter, motor function, and quality of life of the affected extremity were measured, along with skin mechanical properties using a skin elasticity meter. [Results] Skin mechanical properties on the affected side before intervention were inferior to those of the unaffected side. During inpatient CDT, in addition to reductions in limb circumference and improvements in motor function and quality of life, all three parameters of skin mechanical properties also improved. [Conclusion] These findings suggest that measuring skin mechanical properties using a skin elasticity meter provides a useful quantitative assessment for longitudinal evaluation in BCRL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.