ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Validation of heart rate measured by the consumer-level wearable device Fitbit: a cross-sectional observational study.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bidirectional Associations Between Autonomic Function, Sleep Quality, and Daily Fatigue and Energy Symptoms in Long COVID: Longitudinal Digital Health Study.JMIR cardio · 2026Observational
- Effect of Zinc Hydroxychloride and Copper Hydroxychloride in Compound Feed on Rearing Results and Carcass Characteristics of Broiler Chickens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] The present study aimed to validate the heart rate of the consumer-level wearable device Fitbit Inspire 3. [Participants and Methods] Participants were 22 healthy university students (20.9 ± 0.6 years, 11 males and 11 females). They performed 5-minute resting lying, sitting, walking (3.2 km/h, 4.2 km/h, 6.0 km/h and 3.2 km/h with 3 kg backpack) and running (8.4 km/h running) on a treadmill, and stair climbing, with Fitbit- and electrocardiogram-based heart rate (Fitbit-HR and ECG-HR). The relationship between Fitbit-HR and ECG-HR was evaluated using a generalized linear mixed model. Additionally, Brandt-Altman analysis and absolute percentage error were used to examine the measurement error. [Results] Fitbit-HR was strongly associated with ECG-HR and oxygen uptake. In the Brandt-Altman analysis with Fitbit-HR and reference ECG-HR, most plots were within the limit of agreement. Fitbit-HR showed significant fixed errors, which were, on average, three beats smaller than those of ECG-HR. No significant proportional errors are observed. The mean absolute percentage error for most of the tasks was less than 10%. [Conclusion] The Fitbit Inspire 3 showed a strong correlation and clinically acceptable agreement with ECG-HR in healthy young adults, despite a small, consistent underestimation. Its validity was supported by its association with oxygen uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.