ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2025
Effectiveness of Short-Acting Oral Antihypertensives in Asymptomatic Markedly Elevated Blood Pressure: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighted Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although guidelines recommend gradual blood pressure (BP) reduction in asymptomatic markedly elevated BP (AMEBP), short-acting oral antihypertensives are often used despite limited evidence - driven by healthcare providers' concerns or institutional policies - thereby increasing system burden. This study aimed to identify practical regimens enabling safe, timely discharge and continuity of care. Methods: This retrospective cohort included patients with AMEBP (systolic BP > 180 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP > 110 mm Hg), who presented to the emergency department (ED) of Lampang Hospital between January and December 2023. Oral regimens included captopril, hydralazine, metoprolol (25 mg each), or combinations. The outcome was mean arterial pressure (MAP) reduction within 60 min, classified as no reduction (< 10%), appropriate reduction (10-15%), or over-reduction (> 15%). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted for regimen selection, and multinomial odds ratios (mORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Results: Among 158 patients (mean age 60 years; 67.1% female), baseline MAP was 142.4 ± 16.2 mm Hg. Captopril and hydralazine monotherapy were most likely to achieve appropriate reduction (captopril: mOR: 2.91; 95% CI: 0.96, 8.76; P = 0.058; hydralazine: mOR: 2.76; 95% CI: 0.84, 9.11; P = 0.096). Metoprolol was associated with inappropriate response, while captopril plus hydralazine had highest odds of over-reduction (mOR: 3.04; 95% CI: 1.02, 9.00; P = 0.045). Conclusions: Although urgent BP reduction is not routinely recommended in the ED, oral captopril appears to be a reasonable first-line option when clinically necessary, while hydralazine may be a suitable alternative. Combination of these two drugs should be used with caution due to the risk of excessive MAP reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.