ReviewInternational journal of medical sciences2025
Exploring the Role of Tripeptides in Wound Healing and Skin Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in International journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review of the Mechanisms and Therapeutic Applications of GHK-Cu (Glycyl-L-Histidyl-L-Lysine-Copper Complex) in Topical Microneedle Delivery: A Case for Expanded Clinical Trials.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Regenerative Approaches to Enhance the Skin Microenvironment and Boost Aesthetic Efficacy: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Royal jelly protein hydrolysates accelerate in vitro diabetic wound healing by enhancing keratinocytes functions and suppressing macrophage-mediated inflammation.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- Gingival Thickness Improvement After Atelocollagen Injection-Retrospective Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Peptide-Based Nanocarriers for Targeted Drug Delivery: Recent Advances, Strategies, and Therapeutic Frontiers.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound healing is a complex and dynamic process that requires the coordination of cellular, molecular, and physiological events to restore tissue integrity. Despite notable advances in treatment strategies, optimizing healing outcomes, particularly in chronic wounds, remains a major challenge. Emerging evidence highlights the therapeutic promise of peptides, especially tripeptides, in accelerating tissue repair through diverse mechanisms. These short peptides regulate key processes such as cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation, while also modulating inflammation, promoting angiogenesis, and facilitating extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. This review, covering studies published between 2016 and 2025, explores the role of tripeptides in enhancing wound repair, emphasizing their biological functions, mechanisms of action, and therapeutic applications. Recent findings demonstrate that tripeptides can stimulate fibroblast migration, enhance collagen deposition, and support angiogenesis. In addition, they exhibit antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties, making them valuable candidates for both acute and chronic wound management. GHK-based formulations, including nanoparticle conjugates, hydrogels, and clinical derivatives such as TriHex and TriHex 2.0, enhance fibroblast migration, ECM remodeling, collagen and elastin synthesis, and wound closure while providing antimicrobial activity. KdPT mitigates hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress and restores keratinocyte function, whereas KPV-loaded hydrogels reduce inflammation, promote tissue regeneration, and combat MRSA infections. Additionally, lipotripeptides (DICAMs) inhibit and disrupt bacterial biofilms, and GPE supports neuroprotection and regeneration through ERK and PI3K/Akt signaling activation. Beyond wound repair, this review also discusses comparative physicochemical properties and wound healing applications of tripeptides versus larger peptides, factors influencing their performance, strategies for combination with biomaterial scaffolds, and emerging applications in fields such as cancer and cosmetics. Collectively, tripeptides represent a promising class of multifunctional bioactive molecules in wound care, offering novel avenues for targeted tissue regeneration. Future research should focus on improving their stability, bioavailability, and delivery systems to fully harness their clinical potential in regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.