ArticleAlpha psychiatry2025
Autism in Adults in Romania: Challenges in Diagnosis and Screening.
Article in Alpha psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to the absence of validated screening tools for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in adults without intellectual or language deficits in Romania, clinicians often overlook ASD during evaluations, leading to frequent misdiagnoses. To screen for symptoms of comorbid pathologies in an ASD sample compared with a non-ASD sample using the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ) and to establish cut-off scores for the Romanian-translated versions of the Autism Quotient (AQ) and Empathy Quotient (EQ). Methods: The study included 143 participants, 31 diagnosed with ASD and 112 from the general population. Both groups completed the PDSQ, AQ, and EQ. Analyses focused on the factorial structure, reliability, criterion validity, sensitivity, and specificity of the AQ and EQ, as well as correlations between AQ/EQ scores and PDSQ scores. Results: Higher AQ scores were associated with anxiety, trauma, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms. A cut-off score of 21 on the AQ accurately classified 100% of clinically diagnosed ASD participants and correctly identified 80% of non-ASD participants, yielding an overall accuracy of 84%. For the EQ, a cut-off score of 26 achieved the highest specificity while maintaining optimal sensitivity, with an overall accuracy of 88%. Both AQ and EQ demonstrated good internal consistency and reliability. Conclusion: The Romanian versions of the AQ and EQ are highly reliable screening tools for clinical use. Correlations between AQ scores and elevated anxiety, OCD, and trauma symptoms on the PDSQ highlight the importance of assessing ASD comorbidities during clinical evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.